Difference between revisions of "CRAP"
m (Text replacement - "\[\[(19[0-9][0-9])]]" to "$1") |
m |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | (Were you looking for [[Cascade Regional APA]] or the [[Crap | + | (Were you looking for [[Cascade Regional APA]] or the [[Crap|fanzine by Doug Fratz]]?) |
+ | |||
'''Cruddily Reproduced Amateur Press''', originally '''Carbon Reproduced Amateur Press'''. | '''Cruddily Reproduced Amateur Press''', originally '''Carbon Reproduced Amateur Press'''. | ||
− | It was started in March 1958 when [[Bill Meyers]] started sending a [[carbonzine]], ''[[BEM]]'', to four friends. After a visit by [[Bruce Pelz]], he mailed the | + | It was started in March 1958 when [[Bill Meyers]] started sending a [[carbonzine]], ''[[BEM (Meyers)]]'', to four friends. After a visit by [[Bruce Pelz]], he mailed the 22nd ''BEM'' as the first ''CRAP'' [[mailing]] with five members. Mailings were twice a month. ''CRAP'' was reputed to have a motto too obscene for [[fans]] in general to know. |
− | By the 55th [[mailing]], membership had doubled. This was beyond the [[repro]] capabilities of [[carbon paper]], but the tradition was preserved by using either [[ | + | By the 55th [[mailing]], membership had doubled. This was beyond the [[repro]] capabilities of [[carbon paper]], but the [[tradition]] was preserved by using either [[Spirit Duplication|ditto]] or a [[stencil]] cut using something called a "carbon". |
− | The | + | The 1950s saw the emergence of [[omniapans]] who tried to join every [[APA]]. These people were felt to be not taking the purposes of the [[apas]] they joined seriously, so some [[apas]] took steps to remove them. (Besides, what [[fan]] could resist the challenge of keeping another [[fan]] from being a successful [[completist]]?) ''CRAP'' dealt with the [[omniapans]] in 1961 by officially shutting down and then re-opening as a [[secret apa]], ''[[APA-X]]'', including everyone but the offending members. |
− | Members and contributions: | + | '''Members and contributions:''' |
* [[Robert Lichtman]] -- ''[[Quel Dommage]]'' | * [[Robert Lichtman]] -- ''[[Quel Dommage]]'' | ||
+ | * [[Andy Main]] -- | ||
+ | * [[Bill Meyers]] -- | ||
* [[June Moffatt]] -- | * [[June Moffatt]] -- | ||
* [[Len Moffatt]] -- | * [[Len Moffatt]] -- | ||
Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
* [[Bruce Pelz]] -- ''[[Compos'd Heap]]'' | * [[Bruce Pelz]] -- ''[[Compos'd Heap]]'' | ||
− | {{publication}} | + | {{publication | start=1958|end=1961}} |
− | |||
[[Category:APA]] | [[Category:APA]] | ||
[[Category:Initialism]] | [[Category:Initialism]] | ||
[[Category:US]] | [[Category:US]] |
Latest revision as of 22:37, 4 October 2020
(Were you looking for Cascade Regional APA or the fanzine by Doug Fratz?)
Cruddily Reproduced Amateur Press, originally Carbon Reproduced Amateur Press.
It was started in March 1958 when Bill Meyers started sending a carbonzine, BEM, to four friends. After a visit by Bruce Pelz, he mailed the 22nd BEM as the first CRAP mailing with five members. Mailings were twice a month. CRAP was reputed to have a motto too obscene for fans in general to know.
By the 55th mailing, membership had doubled. This was beyond the repro capabilities of carbon paper, but the tradition was preserved by using either ditto or a stencil cut using something called a "carbon".
The 1950s saw the emergence of omniapans who tried to join every APA. These people were felt to be not taking the purposes of the apas they joined seriously, so some apas took steps to remove them. (Besides, what fan could resist the challenge of keeping another fan from being a successful completist?) CRAP dealt with the omniapans in 1961 by officially shutting down and then re-opening as a secret apa, APA-X, including everyone but the offending members.
Members and contributions:
- Robert Lichtman -- Quel Dommage
- Andy Main --
- Bill Meyers --
- June Moffatt --
- Len Moffatt --
- Norm Metcalf --
- Bruce Pelz -- Compos'd Heap
Publication | 1958—1961 |
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |