Difference between revisions of "Extrapolation"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
(Did you mean a [[Extrapolation (Clareson)|Tom Clareson fanzine]]?)
+
''(Did you mean a [[Extrapolation (Clareson)|Tom Clareson fanzine]]?)''
 
 
  
 
{{fancy2|text=
 
{{fancy2|text=
([[DeCamp]]) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the [[imagination]] consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in [[science-fiction]]. There are few really impressive examples; [[Verne]] is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The [[Cleve Cartmill|bomb story]] that got [[ASF]] raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in [[prozines]] (and even [[comic books]]) about the explosive virtues of [[U]]<sup>235</sup>. Perhaps the Future Histories of [[Heinlein]] and [[Poul Anderson]] may be considered examples of extrapolation.  
+
([[L. Sprague de Camp|DeCamp]]) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the [[imagination]] consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in [[science-fiction]]. There are few really impressive examples; [[Jules Verne|Verne]] is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The [[Cleve Cartmill|bomb story]] that got [[ASF]] raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in [[prozines]] (and even [[comic books]]) about the explosive virtues of [[U]]<sup>235</sup>. Perhaps the Future Histories of [[Robert A. Heinlein|Heinlein]] and [[Poul Anderson]] may be considered examples of extrapolation.  
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 9: Line 8:
 
The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among [[scientifictionists]]. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the [[imagination]] consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in [[science-fiction]].  
 
The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among [[scientifictionists]]. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the [[imagination]] consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in [[science-fiction]].  
 
}}
 
}}
 +
  
 
{{fanspeak}}
 
{{fanspeak}}
 
[[Category:fancy1]]
 
[[Category:fancy1]]
 
[[Category:fancy2]]
 
[[Category:fancy2]]

Latest revision as of 16:52, 28 March 2023

(Did you mean a Tom Clareson fanzine?)

From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959
(DeCamp) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the imagination consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in science-fiction. There are few really impressive examples; Verne is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The bomb story that got ASF raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in prozines (and even comic books) about the explosive virtues of U235. Perhaps the Future Histories of Heinlein and Poul Anderson may be considered examples of extrapolation.
From Fancyclopedia 1, ca. 1944
The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among scientifictionists. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the imagination consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in science-fiction.



Fanspeak
This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc.