Difference between revisions of "Operation Armageddon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Clarification and correct con link.) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Also a [[fanzine]] edited by [[Vince Clarke]] with two issues in 1954. | Also a [[fanzine]] edited by [[Vince Clarke]] with two issues in 1954. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tab head=top> | ||
+ | Issue || Date || Pages || Notes | ||
+ | 1 || 1954 || 2 || | ||
+ | 2 || 1954 || 2 || | ||
+ | 3 || April 25, 1954 || 4 || titled '''''Operation Splash''''; co-edited by [[Dave Newman]] | ||
+ | </tab> | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= |
Revision as of 12:38, 10 February 2023
Also a fanzine edited by Vin¢ Clarke with two issues in 1954.
Issue | Date | Pages | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1954 | 2 | |
2 | 1954 | 2 | |
3 | April 25, 1954 | 4 | titled Operation Splash'; co-edited by Dave Newman |
From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
At the height of ill-feeling between the London Circle and the Bloody Provincials, 1954, the Elsie Horde devised a wonderfully complicated scheme to wreck the Mancon, and gave it this ominous title. It included such things as printing up a rather dismal fake program -- and following this with a fake indignant denial with announcement of an even more dismal program; hunting imaginary rats during speeches; getting the con committee drunk; going around measuring odd lengths with string during the program ("not anything in particular -- just lengths "); starting card games on the floor when/if things got boring, and other resourceful diabolisms. But when it came to the sticking point they relented and fraternized with the Uitlanders, producing the first US-style con -- or so say witnesses who may be giving US cons too much credit for amiability. |
The Vince Clarke fanzine Operation Armageddon listed many ways to disrupt the convention, including the above. Though referred to in the Fancyclopedia 2 extract as the Mancon, the 1954 target convention was officially the Supermancon.
Publication | 1954 |
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |