Difference between revisions of "Pseudo-Campbell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
| − | ([[Boggs]]) It is hard to say whether aesthetic or [[fanationalistic]] considerations moved [[Redd Boggs]] to denounce this sort of [[fan editor]]. The pseudo-[[Campbell]] is a wittold who spreads his [[subzine]]'s price on the cover, decorates the thing with blurbs on the contents, tries to strike a balance between [[articles]] and fiction, and otherwise sets himself to produce a [[fanzine]] which is simply an imitation of a [[prozine]], rather than a proper specimen of an [[amateur]] publication. | + | ([[Redd Boggs|Boggs]]) It is hard to say whether aesthetic or [[fanationalistic]] considerations moved [[Redd Boggs]] to denounce this sort of [[fan editor]]. The pseudo-[[John W. Campbell|Campbell]] is a wittold who spreads his [[subzine]]'s price on the cover, decorates the thing with blurbs on the contents, tries to strike a balance between [[articles]] and [[fiction]], and otherwise sets himself to produce a [[fanzine]] which is simply an imitation of a [[prozine]], rather than a proper specimen of an [[amateur]] publication. Fanzines, after all, are intended for a rather small and well-defined group, not an anonymous mass; imitation of the [[proz]] (except satirically) violates artistic integrity aesthetically and from the fanationalistic point of view merely gives us an attempt at something the [[prozines]] do far better, and with four-color covers to boot. |
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| + | {{fanspeak|start=1950s}} | ||
[[Category:fancy2]] | [[Category:fancy2]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:25, 14 August 2023
| From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
| (Boggs) It is hard to say whether aesthetic or fanationalistic considerations moved Redd Boggs to denounce this sort of fan editor. The pseudo-Campbell is a wittold who spreads his subzine's price on the cover, decorates the thing with blurbs on the contents, tries to strike a balance between articles and fiction, and otherwise sets himself to produce a fanzine which is simply an imitation of a prozine, rather than a proper specimen of an amateur publication. Fanzines, after all, are intended for a rather small and well-defined group, not an anonymous mass; imitation of the proz (except satirically) violates artistic integrity aesthetically and from the fanationalistic point of view merely gives us an attempt at something the prozines do far better, and with four-color covers to boot. |
| Fanspeak | 1950s— |
| This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc. |
