Difference between revisions of "LASFS Newsletter"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "\[\[(19[0-9][0-9])]]" to "$1")
(Added #8 & #12, plus additional details on #1.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
  Issue || Date || Pages || Notes  
 
  Issue || Date || Pages || Notes  
 
1 ||1960 || ||editor is [[Bjo Trimble]] with co-editors  
 
1 ||1960 || ||editor is [[Bjo Trimble]] with co-editors  
10 ||1962 || ||Final [[Bjo Trimble]]-edited issue  
+
8 || February 1962 || 6 || ed. [[Bjo Trimble]]. This is "#8, or so says Ron Ellik". Undated, but the next weekly meeting is listed as Feb. 22, 1962.
17 ||mid-1973 || ||Final [[Dian-Girard]]-edited issue  
+
10 ||April 15, 1962 || 4 ||Final [[Bjo Trimble]]-edited issue  
 +
12 ||September 30, 1962 || 4 || ed. [[Dian Girard]].
 +
17 ||mid-1973 || ||Final [[Dian Girard]]-edited issue  
 
19 ||August 1963 || ||  
 
19 ||August 1963 || ||  
 
21b ||December 1963 || ||  
 
21b ||December 1963 || ||  

Revision as of 22:10, 25 November 2022

The LASFS Newsletter was started by Bjo Trimble in 1960, and she edited it (with help from a couple of co-editors) through issue 10 in 1962. Not long after, Dian Girard took over through issue 17 in mid-1963. Redd Boggs then picked it up after a short hiatus and published three issues. Finally, Bill Blackbeard and then Ted Johnstone edited the last seven issues ending publication in 1965 when De Profundis replaced it.

Issue Date Pages Notes
1 1960 editor is Bjo Trimble with co-editors
8 February 1962 6 ed. Bjo Trimble. This is "#8, or so says Ron Ellik". Undated, but the next weekly meeting is listed as Feb. 22, 1962.
10 April 15, 1962 4 Final Bjo Trimble-edited issue
12 September 30, 1962 4 ed. Dian Girard.
17 mid-1973 Final Dian Girard-edited issue
19 August 1963
21b December 1963
22 February 1964
23 April 1964
23a June 1964
24 July 1964
24a August 1964
V? #1 October 1964
V13 #7 October 1964
V5 #2 December 1964
V5 #3 February 1965


Publication ????
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications.