Difference between revisions of "Brackets"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "]]]" to "]]") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
− | Perhaps nowhere have [[fans]] shown more varied ingenuity than in simulating brackets with only the resources of the [[typer]]keyboard. Some, 'tis true, draw them in afterwards [like [[Swisher]] but most fans use the keys, which is more convenient. [[Tucker]] and others employ double parentheses a half space apart ((apart)), while [[Speer]] sometimes uses -(Gregg shorthand parentheses)-. [[Youd]]'s / | + | Perhaps nowhere have [[fans]] shown more varied ingenuity than in simulating brackets with only the resources of the [[typer]]keyboard. Some, 'tis true, draw them in afterwards [like [[Swisher]] but most fans use the keys, which is more convenient. [[Tucker]] and others employ double parentheses a half space apart ((apart)), while [[Speer]] sometimes uses -(Gregg shorthand parentheses)-. [[Youd]]'s /_brackets with underlining_/ made with the [[virgule]] have been the most popular, tho the underlining is frequently dispensed with -- or mutated; [[Mirta Forsto]] used tildes for underlining. [[Eney]] and some others use the <s>/</s>crossed slant-bar<s>/</s> . |
The purpose of brackets is to distinguish ordinary parentheses by the writer from editorial comments such as [nuts! -ed] inserted in the body of a letter or article. [[Ray Bradbury]] tried an unsuccessful mutation in simply making his comments ALL-CAP. | The purpose of brackets is to distinguish ordinary parentheses by the writer from editorial comments such as [nuts! -ed] inserted in the body of a letter or article. [[Ray Bradbury]] tried an unsuccessful mutation in simply making his comments ALL-CAP. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I forgot to mention the commonest method of all: double parentheses a full space apart ( ( ) ). /That's one of the drawbacks of chasing the esoteric: I miss the blatantly obvious./ Some get so enamored of double parens that they use 'em even when not needed; [[Larry Stark]] was a conspicuous sinner. | I forgot to mention the commonest method of all: double parentheses a full space apart ( ( ) ). /That's one of the drawbacks of chasing the esoteric: I miss the blatantly obvious./ Some get so enamored of double parens that they use 'em even when not needed; [[Larry Stark]] was a conspicuous sinner. | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Computers have rendered these [[typewriter]] makeshifts obsolete. | ||
+ | |||
{{publishing}} | {{publishing}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:obsolete]] | |
[[Category:fancy1]] | [[Category:fancy1]] | ||
[[Category:fancy2]] | [[Category:fancy2]] |
Revision as of 12:05, 8 July 2021
From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
Perhaps nowhere have fans shown more varied ingenuity than in simulating brackets with only the resources of the typerkeyboard. Some, 'tis true, draw them in afterwards [like Swisher but most fans use the keys, which is more convenient. Tucker and others employ double parentheses a half space apart ((apart)), while Speer sometimes uses -(Gregg shorthand parentheses)-. Youd's /_brackets with underlining_/ made with the virgule have been the most popular, tho the underlining is frequently dispensed with -- or mutated; Mirta Forsto used tildes for underlining. Eney and some others use the The purpose of brackets is to distinguish ordinary parentheses by the writer from editorial comments such as [nuts! -ed] inserted in the body of a letter or article. Ray Bradbury tried an unsuccessful mutation in simply making his comments ALL-CAP. from Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement ca. 1960: I forgot to mention the commonest method of all: double parentheses a full space apart ( ( ) ). /That's one of the drawbacks of chasing the esoteric: I miss the blatantly obvious./ Some get so enamored of double parens that they use 'em even when not needed; Larry Stark was a conspicuous sinner. |
Computers have rendered these typewriter makeshifts obsolete.
Publishing |